Table of Content
A Quality of Earnings (QoE) report validates earnings sustainability by adjusting for one-offs, accounting inconsistencies, and working capital impact, giving buyers and sellers a clear, reliable view of the company’s normalized performance.
In mergers and acquisitions, the key question is “What is this business really earning?” The answer shapes valuation, deal structure, and transaction success. Quality of Earnings (QoE) analysis provides this clarity, ensuring informed decisions and reducing financial risks.
A Quality of Earnings (QoE) report goes beyond standard financial statements, offering a detailed analysis of a target company’s financials to reveal its true, sustainable earning potential. For buyers and sellers, understanding the QoE meaning in finance is key to a clear and successful deal.
This guide explains the Quality of Earnings due diligence process, showing how it examines revenue, expenses, and adjustments, and explains why it is a non-negotiable part of modern mergers and acquisitions.
What Is a Quality of Earnings (QoE) Report?
So, what is a quality of earnings report? It is an independent analysis of a company’s historical earnings to determine whether they are accurate and likely to remain sustainable. Professional Quality of Earnings Services apply this analysis to normalized EBITDA, revenue quality, working capital, and transaction risks before closing.
QoE report adjusts reported earnings for non-recurring items, accounting choices, and operational inconsistencies. The main aim is to provide a “normalized” view of profitability, usually shown as Normalized EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization).
The results of a quality of earnings analysis go beyond a single number. They typically include:
- Adjusted net income or EBITDA (Normalized EBITDA)
- Identification of one-off and non-operating expenses
- Working capital adjustments
- Revenue recognition review
- Customer concentration risk analysis
Understanding what is a QoE matters because different users rely on it for specific needs:
- Private equity firms and corporate buyers use it to validate seller’s financial claims and build accurate valuation models.
- Lenders use it to test a company’s debt repayment capacity.
- Sellers use it to prepare for a sale, identify possible issues early, and support their asking price.
In practice, QoE meaning finance is part of pre-acquisition due diligence. Prepared before the final agreement, it guides sale and purchase agreement (SPA) clauses and supports earn-out or working capital negotiations. Without a QoE, buyers rely only on GAAP statements, which ignore unusual or non-recurring items.
Many confuse reported earnings with earnings quality. Reported earnings show what a company records in financial statements, while earnings quality measures how reliable, sustainable, and free from accounting distortions those earnings are. The table below illustrates this key difference.
| Aspect | Reported Earnings | Earnings Quality (QoE View) |
|---|---|---|
| Basis | Taken directly from GAAP or statutory financials | Adjusted for unusual or non-recurring items |
| Includes | All items, including one-time gains/losses and accounting choices | Only core, ongoing business results after removing non-recurring items |
| Purpose | Meets compliance and disclosure standards | Helps investors, lenders, and buyers assess true profitability |
| Common Output | Net income, reported EBITDA | Normalized EBITDA or adjusted net income |
Why QoE Matters in Financial Due Diligence
A quality of earnings (QoE) due diligence process is essential to reducing risk in a transaction. Company valuations are often based on a multiple of EBITDA. If EBITDA is overstated or not sustainable, the buyer could overpay by millions.
The QoE report directly affects critical deal terms in the Sale and Purchase Agreement (SPA). One key area is the analysis of net working capital (NWC). The report defines a normal NWC level, which sets the “WC peg” or target in the SPA. This ensures that neither party is disadvantaged by unusual changes in working capital around the closing date.
“The QoE is not just about verifying past performance; it builds a reliable forecast. Our adjustments shape the valuation model and protect our clients from post-deal surprises, especially regarding working capital and earn-outs.”
— Alex Silensky, Co-founder at OGScapital
A thorough quality of earnings assessment can also highlight risks that influence other deal terms.
For example, if a seller’s earnings depend heavily on a single customer or a one-off project, the buyer may negotiate for an earn-out provision. An earn-out makes a portion of the purchase price contingent on the business achieving agreed performance targets after the sale, safeguarding the buyer if expected earnings do not materialize.
QoE vs Audit
People often confuse a quality of earnings report vs audit, but they serve very different purposes.
A financial audit provides an opinion on whether a company’s financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with a specific accounting framework (like GAAP or IFRS).
A QoE analysis, on the other hand, is not an opinion. It is an investigative process designed to normalize earnings for a transaction. It does not check for compliance in the same way an audit does. Instead, it scrutinizes the quality and sustainability of those earnings.
The table below highlights the quality of earnings report vs audit key differences:
| Aspect | Financial Audit | Quality of Earnings (QoE) Report |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | Provide an opinion on historical financial statement fairness. | Assess the sustainability of future earnings and cash flows for a transaction. |
| Scope | Follows formal auditing standards (e.g., GAAS). Focuses on materiality across the entire financial statements. | Flexible and tailored to the deal. Focuses on EBITDA, net working capital, and key business drivers. |
| Materiality | Defined in the context of the overall financial statements. An item might be immaterial for an audit but very material for a QoE. | Lower threshold. Focuses on items that could impact valuation, even if small in an audit context. |
| Output | An audit opinion (e.g., “unqualified opinion”). | A detailed report with a calculation of Normalized EBITDA, NWC analysis, and identified risks. |
In short, an audit looks backward to confirm what happened. A QoE looks forward to helping predict what will happen, making it an essential tool for valuation and deal-making.
QoE Methodology & Process Steps
A quality of earnings review follows a structured process to ensure accurate QoE analysis. While the depth of work depends on the company’s size and structure, the core steps remain the same. The process is collaborative and requires constant communication with management to validate findings and address concerns.
The typical quality of earnings process steps include:
Step 1: Engagement Setup and Scope Definition
The process starts with a meeting to confirm objectives, key focus areas, and the project timeline. A scope of work (SoW) document is prepared to outline deliverables, responsibilities, and data access.
Key considerations include:
- Transaction type (asset vs stock deal)
- Carve-out complexity
- International operations
- Known accounting or operational issues
This planning phase usually takes 2–3 days but prevents delays and scope changes later. The quality of earnings scope of work also defines the historical period to be analyzed (normally two to three years plus the trailing twelve months) and focus areas such as proof of cash, revenue trends, gross margin, and operating expense analysis.
Step 2: Data Room Review and Document Analysis
The analytical team issues a request list for financial and operational data to identify trends, any unusual items, or areas requiring detailed analysis. Essential documents include:
- Monthly financial statements for 24-36 months
- General ledger details for major accounts
- Revenue contracts and pricing agreements
- Payroll and employee data
- Working capital schedules and aging reports
Step 3: Analytical Procedures and Testing
The quality of earnings analysis begins with trend analysis, ratio calculations, and variance testing. The team reconciles data and evaluates revenue, margin, and expense patterns in detail.
Step 4: Management Interviews
The analytical team holds regular interview sessions with management to understand business operations, discuss preliminary findings, and ask clarifying questions about trends and anomalies.
Step 5: Draft Findings & Report
The team prepares a draft report that summarizes the key findings, adjustments to EBITDA, and working capital analysis. This draft is shared with the client for review and discussion.
Step 6: Final Report Delivery
After incorporating feedback and finalizing all analyses, the final QoE report is issued. This document serves as a key reference throughout the final stages of the deal.
QoE Adjustments & Normalized EBITDA
The main result of a QoE report is Normalized EBITDA. It’s calculated by adjusting reported EBITDA for non-recurring items, accounting errors, and unusual costs. These quality of earnings adjustments help present the company’s actual earnings potential accurately.
Normalized EBITDA = Reported EBITDA +/- Non-Recurring Revenue & Expenses +/- Out-of-Period Adjustments +/- Non-Operating Items +/- Pro Forma & Run-Rate Adjustments
EBITDA Add-Backs
EBITDA Add-Backs are expenses on the income statement that are added back to profit because they are not expected to continue after the acquisition. Common normalized EBITDA adjustments include:
- One-Time or Non-Recurring Expenses: Such as legal fees from a lawsuit, severance for a one-time layoff, or costs from a facility relocation.
- Discretionary Owner Expenses: Above-market owner salaries, personal travel, or family members on payroll who are not active in the business.
- Non-Operating Items: Gains or losses from the sale of assets or other activities unrelated to the core business operations.
Sample QoE Adjustments (Normalized EBITDA Calculation)
| Particular | Adjustment Type | Add-Back / Deduction ($) |
|---|---|---|
| Opening: Net Income | $700,000 | |
| Add: Interest Expense | $120,000 | |
| Add: Taxes | $80,000 | |
| Add: Depreciation & Amortization | $100,000 | |
| Reported EBITDA | $1,000,000 | |
| Add: Positive EBITDA Add-Backs | ||
| A. Non-Recurring or One-Time Expenses | ||
| Litigation settlements (non-recurring) | $50,000 | |
| Restructuring or reorganization costs | $40,000 | |
| Transaction-related expenses (M&A, advisory) | $60,000 | |
| Severance or termination payments | $30,000 | |
| One-time consulting fees | $20,000 | |
| B. Owner and Related-Party Adjustments | ||
| Owner’s personal travel and entertainment | $15,000 | |
| Personal vehicle expenses | $10,000 | |
| Charitable contributions (non-business) | $5,000 | |
| Family members on payroll (non-business roles) | $12,000 | |
| Excess owner compensation | $25,000 | |
| C. Non-Cash Expenses | ||
| Impairments or write-downs | $18,000 | |
| Stock-based compensation | $22,000 | |
| Unrealized losses on investments or Forex | $8,000 | |
| D. Other Non-Operating or Extraordinary Items | ||
| Start-up or pre-opening costs | $14,000 | |
| Disaster recovery costs | $16,000 | |
| Loss on asset sale | $9,000 | |
| Penalties or fines (non-recurring) | $7,000 | |
| Insurance proceeds (unusual event) | $12,000 | |
| Subtotal – Positive EBITDA Add-Backs | $373,000 | |
| Less: Negative EBITDA Add-Backs | ||
| A. Recurring and Understated Expenses | ||
| Rent adjusted to market rates | $(20,000) | |
| Salaries normalized to market | $(30,000) | |
| Family members underpaid (normalized) | $(10,000) | |
| Annual audit and compliance fees | $(12,000) | |
| Ongoing IT maintenance | $(8,000) | |
| Repair and maintenance capitalized mistakenly | $(9,000) | |
| B. Operating and Normalization Adjustments | ||
| Replacement costs for outdated equipment | $(15,000) | |
| Customer discounts or incentives not recorded | $(6,000) | |
| Vendor credits unsustainable | $(5,000) | |
| Related-party transactions normalized | $(10,000) | |
| C. Expected or Recurring Legal and Compliance Costs | ||
| Ongoing litigation costs | $(12,000) | |
| Regulatory compliance | $(7,000) | |
| Environmental remediation (recurring) | $(8,000) | |
| D. Other Negative Adjustments | ||
| Insurance premiums normalized | $(6,000) | |
| Subsidized utilities or facility costs | $(4,000) | |
| Deferred operating costs | $(5,000) | |
| Subtotal – Negative EBITDA Add-Backs | $(167,000) | |
| Normalized EBITDA | $1,195,000 |
Working Capital Adjustments
Working capital adjustments are made during a Quality of Earnings review or an M&A deal to align a company’s net working capital (NWC = Current Operating Assets – Current Operating Liabilities) with its normal operational level. These adjustments account for seasonality, unusual customer or vendor payment terms near closing, and normalize rapid growth.
In practice, the company’s Actual Closing Working Capital is compared with an agreed-upon Target Working Capital by both parties. This ensures the purchase price reflects a fair and sustainable liquidity position for ongoing business needs.
Sample Working Capital Reconciliation
| Particulars | Closing Balance | Adjustment | Adjusted Balance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Current Assets | |||
| Accounts Receivable (AR) | $5,200,000 | $5,200,000 | |
| Add: Early customer collections | $300,000 | $5,500,000 | |
| Less: Delayed collections | $(150,000) | $5,350,000 | |
| Less: Non-trade receivables | $(50,000) | $5,300,000 | |
| Less: Doubtful/uncollectible AR | $(100,000) | $5,200,000 | |
| Less: Intercompany receivables | $(75,000) | $5,125,000 | |
| Less: Unrecorded credit notes/rebates | $(25,000) | $5,100,000 | |
| Accounts Receivable (Adjusted) | $5,100,000 | ||
| Inventory | $3,800,000 | $3,800,000 | |
| Less: Seasonal buildup/depletion | $(200,000) | $3,600,000 | |
| Less: Obsolete/slow-moving stock | $(100,000) | $3,500,000 | |
| Less: Consignment/3rd-party goods | $(50,000) | $3,450,000 | |
| Less: Damaged/excess stock | $(25,000) | $3,425,000 | |
| Less: One-time bulk purchases | $(75,000) | $3,350,000 | |
| Add: Valuation method differences | $50,000 | $3,400,000 | |
| Inventory (Adjusted) | $3,400,000 | ||
| Prepaid Expenses & Other C/A | $500,000 | $500,000 | |
| Less: One-off prepayments | $(50,000) | $450,000 | |
| Less: Non-operating prepaids | $(25,000) | $425,000 | |
| Less: Advances/deposits not recurring | $(25,000) | $400,000 | |
| Prepaid Expenses & Other C/A (Adjusted) | $400,000 | ||
| Total Current Assets (Adjusted) | $8,900,000 | ||
| Current Liabilities | |||
| Accounts Payable (AP) | $2,700,000 | $2,700,000 | |
| Add: Delayed vendor payments | $100,000 | $2,800,000 | |
| Less: Early vendor payments | $(50,000) | $2,750,000 | |
| Less: Related-party payables | $(25,000) | $2,725,000 | |
| Less: Non-trade liabilities | $(25,000) | $2,700,000 | |
| Accounts Payable (Adjusted) | $2,700,000 | ||
| Accrued Expenses | $1,200,000 | $1,200,000 | |
| Less: Growth-related accrual spikes | $(50,000) | $1,150,000 | |
| Less: One-time accruals | $(100,000) | $1,050,000 | |
| Add: Payroll/benefits timing | $25,000 | $1,075,000 | |
| Less: Utilities/rent timing | $(10,000) | $1,065,000 | |
| Accrued Expenses (Adjusted) | $1,065,000 | ||
| Other Current Liabilities | $600,000 | $600,000 | |
| Less: Deferred revenue (not assumed) | $(50,000) | $550,000 | |
| Less: One-time provisions | $(25,000) | $525,000 | |
| Less: Intercompany liabilities | $(20,000) | $505,000 | |
| Less: Deal-related accruals | $(30,000) | $475,000 | |
| Other Current Liabilities (Adjusted) | $475,000 | ||
| Total Current Liabilities (Adjusted) | $4,240,000 | ||
| Closing Working Capital (CA – CL) | $5,000,000 | ||
| Total Adjustments | $(860,000) | ||
| Normalized Working Capital (NWC) | $4,140,000 |
Adjustment Impact Rule:
- If Normalized WC > Target WC → Seller gets positive adjustment (price up)
- If Normalized WC < Target WC → Buyer gets negative adjustment (price down)
Revenue Recognition and Quality Analysis
Revenue Recognition and Quality Analysis ensures revenue is recorded in the correct accounting period. It identifies early recognition risks, such as “bill-and-hold” sales, and verifies proper accounting for customer returns and discounts. Period-end cut-off testing helps confirm if the reported revenue is accurate, reliable, and sustainable.
Customer Concentration Analysis
Customer Concentration Analysis examines revenue by customer to assess concentration risk. Relying heavily on one customer can threaten future earnings if lost. The analysis also evaluates customer relationship stability and whether contracts support consistent, long-term revenue for the business after a transaction.
Sample Quality of Earnings Report
A Quality of Earnings (QoE) Report is a financial due diligence document that evaluates the accuracy, sustainability, and reliability of a company’s earnings.
While every QoE report is customized, they generally follow a standard structure to present findings in a logical and easy-to-follow manner. Understanding this structure helps you know what to expect from a sample quality of earnings report.
A typical QoE report example includes the following sections:
1. Executive Summary
The executive summary is a one-to-two-page section that highlights the key findings of the financial due diligence. It provides an overview of the target company’s earnings quality, risks, and important adjustments, allowing investors and buyers to quickly understand the overall financial health before reviewing detailed analysis.
Executive summary usually includes:
- Overview of the company’s financial performance
- Key revenue and expense trends
- Major adjustments to reported earnings
- Normalized EBITDA or net income
- Working capital analysis and adjustments
- One-time or non-recurring items
- Risks and red flags identified during review
- Summary of cash flow analysis
- Overall assessment of earnings sustainability
2. Profit & Loss (Normalized EBITDA)
The Profit & Loss (P&L) statement shows the reported profit/loss of a business as stated in its financial statements, without any adjustments. It presents a direct view of the target company’s revenues, expenses, and net result, giving a clear baseline of financial performance.
The reported profit/loss figures provide the foundation for calculating Normalized EBITDA. While the P&L statement shows the raw outcome, Normalized EBITDA adjusts these results to remove one-time, non-operational, or extraordinary items, making earnings more consistent and useful for analysis.
Normalized EBITDA = Reported EBITDA +/- Non-Recurring Revenue & Expenses +/- Out-of-Period Adjustments +/- Non-Operating Items +/- Pro Forma & Run-Rate Adjustments
Sample Schedule of Normalized EBITDA
| Particular | Amount |
|---|---|
| Reported EBITDA | $ 2,500,000 |
| Add: Non-Recurring/Extraordinary Expenses | $ 300,000 |
| Less: Non-Recurring/Extraordinary Income | $ (150,000) |
| Add: Owner’s/Related Party Compensation (Above market rate adjustment) | $ 200,000 |
| Less: Owner’s/Related Party Compensation (Below market rate adjustment) | $ (100,000) |
| Add: Non-Essential/Personal Expenses included in the business | $ 75,000 |
| Less: Income/Expenses from Discontinued Operations | $ (50,000) |
| Add: Below-Market Rent Expense (Adjust to market rate) | $ 80,000 |
| Less: Above-Market Rent Expense (Adjust to market rate) | $ (60,000) |
| Add: Other Non-Core or One-Time Adjustments | $ 120,000 |
| Less: Other Non-Core or One-Time Adjustments | $ (40,000) |
| Normalized EBITDA (Pro-Forma or Adjusted EBITDA) | $ 2,875,000 |
The normalized EBITDA of $ 2,875,000 shows the company’s true operating profit after adjusting for unusual expenses. Investors can use this figure to assess ongoing profitability, compare with peers, and make informed decisions on valuation or acquisition.
3. Balance Sheet
A balance sheet provides a snapshot of a target company’s financial position at a specific date. It shows what the company owns (assets), what it owes (liabilities), and the residual value for shareholders (equity).
Two key metrics from the balance sheet that investors focus on in a QoE analysis are Net Working Capital (NWC) and Net Debt Position, since both affect deal pricing, liquidity, and risk.
- Net Working Capital (NWC): It shows how much liquidity is tied up in daily operations. Buyers often adjust for seasonality, unusual items, or growth trends to arrive at a normalized NWC.
NWC = Current Operating Assets – Current Operating Liabilities
- Positive NWC shows the company can meet short-term obligations.
- Negative NWC may signal cash flow strain or over-reliance on vendor credit.
- Net Debt Position: It indicates the true debt burden after accounting for available cash. A higher net debt reduces the effective value for shareholders in a transaction.
Net Debt = Long-term Debt + Short-term Debt – Cash & Cash Equivalents
- Higher net debt means more financial risk.
- Lower or negative net debt (excess cash) strengthens the balance sheet and can improve deal value.
Sample Balance Sheet (for QoE Review)
| Particular | Amount (in millions) |
|---|---|
| Assets | |
| Current Assets | |
| Cash & Cash Equivalents | $150 |
| Accounts Receivable | $300 |
| Inventory | $250 |
| Total Current Assets (A) | $700 |
| Non-Current Assets | |
| Property, Plant & Equipment | $500 |
| Other Long-Term Assets | $100 |
| Total Non-Current Assets (B) | $600 |
| Total Assets (A + B) | $1,300 |
| Equity and Liabilities | |
| Current Liabilities | |
| Accounts Payable | $280 |
| Accrued Expenses | $120 |
| Short-Term Debt | $100 |
| Total Current Liabilities (C) | $500 |
| Non-Current Liabilities | |
| Long-Term Debt | $300 |
| Total Non-Current Liabilities (D) | $300 |
| Total Liabilities (C + D) | $800 |
| Shareholders’ Equity | |
| Common Stock | $300 |
| Retained Earnings | $200 |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | $500 |
| Total Liabilities & Equity | $1,300 |
Quick Analysis:
Net Working Capital (NWC): $700 – $500 = $200 million
The company has a healthy short-term buffer to fund operations.
Net Debt Position: ($100 + $300) – $150 = $250 million
The business carries moderate debt after considering available cash.
4. Cash Flow
A cash flow statement shows the cash inflow and outflow of a business during a set period. It tracks three key areas: operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities. In QoE, this statement helps confirm whether reported earnings actually translate into real cash.
The cash flow statement is directly linked to the reconciliation process. It reconciles net income with working capital changes and non-cash items, showing true cash position. It ensures reported earnings match actual cash, reducing risks of overstated profits.
Sample Cash Flow Statement
| Particular | Amount (in millions) |
|---|---|
| Cash Flow from Operating Activities | |
| Net Income | $ 250 |
| Add: Depreciation & Amortization | $ 40 |
| Adjust: Change in Working Capital | $ (30) |
| Net Cash from Operating Activities | $ 260 |
| Cash Flow from Investing Activities | |
| Purchase of Equipment | $ (120) |
| Proceeds from Asset Sale | $ 20 |
| Net Cash from Investing Activities | $ (100) |
| Cash Flow from Financing Activities | |
| Loan Repayment | $ (80) |
| Dividend Paid | $ (30) |
| New Equity Raised | $ 50 |
| Net Cash from Financing Activities | $ (60) |
| Net Increase in Cash | $ 100 |
| Opening Cash Balance | $ 150 |
| Closing Cash Balance | $ 250 |
This cash flow statement shows strong cash from operations of $260 Mn, exceeding investing and financing outflows. After capital spending and debt repayment, cash increased by $100 Mn, signaling financial stability, reliable earnings, and strong investor confidence.
5. Risks and Mitigations
Risks and mitigations analysis identify financial or operational issues that may affect the accuracy or stability of the target company’s earnings and outline actions to reduce them. Risks show potential concerns, while mitigations offer solutions, helping investors and buyers assess reliability, minimize exposure, and understand future performance clearly.
6. Appendices
Appendices sections at the end of a QoE report containing supporting documents, detailed schedules, calculations, and additional data referenced in the main report. They back up findings and let readers verify numbers, assumptions, and analyses without cluttering the main report.
Quality of Earnings Checklist
A quality of earnings checklist is an essential tool for both advisors performing the analysis and companies preparing for it. It ensures all critical areas are examined. The checklist organizes due diligence and reduces the risk of missing key issues.
A good quality of earnings due diligence checklist is organized into several key areas:
| Phase 1: Initial Data Request & Scoping |
| Financial Statements Detailed Trial Balances Management Reports Chart of Accounts Kick-off Call Organizational Chart |
| Phase 2: Revenue Analysis |
| A. Revenue Recognition & Trends Accounting Policy Review Revenue Reconciliation Monthly Trend Analysis Price vs. Volume Analysis Deferred Revenue |
| B. Customer & Product Analysis Customer Concentration Customer Cohort Analysis Product/Service Line Analysis Related-Party Revenue |
| C. Adjustments to Revenue Non-Recurring Revenue Out-of-Period Revenue Bad Debt Analysis |
| Phase 3: COGS & Gross Margin Analysis |
| Gross Margin Trend Analysis Component Analysis Inventory Valuation Policy Inventory Turnover & Days Inventory Outstanding (DIO) Obsolete or Slow-Moving Inventory Physical Inventory Count Reconciliations Supplier Concentration Capitalized Costs Standard Costing |
| Phase 4: Operating Expense (OpEx) Analysis |
| A. Salaries, Wages & Benefits Headcount Analysis Bonus & Commissions Owner/Executive Compensation Severance & Restructuring |
| B. Sales & Marketing Trend Analysis Discretionary Spending Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) |
| C. General & Administrative (G&A) Professional Fees Rent & Facilities Insurance Related-Party Expenses |
| Phase 5: EBITDA Normalization Adjustments |
| Non-Recurring Items Owner & Management Adjustments Accounting Method Changes Pro Forma & Run-Rate Adjustments Other Common Adjustments |
| Phase 6: Cash Flow Overview |
| Cash Flow Analysis EBITDA to FCF Bridge Quality of Cash Flow |
| Phase 7: Balance Sheet & Working Capital |
| A. Net Working Capital (NWC) Analysis Trends in NWC Accounts Normalized Working Capital A/R Aging Analysis A/P Aging Analysis |
| B. Debt & Debt-Like Items Interest-Bearing Debt Unrecorded Liabilities |
| C. Capital Expenditures (CapEx) Maintenance (Recurring) & Growth (Discretionary) CapEx Fixed Asset Register |
| Phase 8: Data Integrity & Reconciliation |
| Tax Reconciliation Bank Reconciliation |
| Phase 9: Final Reporting |
| QoE Report Bridge Analysis Key Findings Supporting Schedules |
You can download our complete Quality of Earnings Checklist in PDF and Word to guide your next project.
QoE Templates & Samples
A strong Quality of Earnings report template can speed up the analysis and reporting process. It provides a clear structure for key schedules, ensuring consistency and clarity. Templates serve as starting points, not final reports, since each deal has unique characteristics.
OGScapital offer several resources to help you get started:
- Quality of Earnings Report PDF (Sample): A full, redacted report showing the structure, language, and types of QoE analysis performed.
- Scope of Work (SoW) Template (DOC): Helps define objectives, scope, and deliverables for a QoE engagement.
- Excel Analysis Schedules (XLSX): Contains core analytical models such as the EBITDA bridge, net working capital roll-forward, and net debt schedule.
Contact us by filling out the form below to receive these QoE templates and samples.
Buy-Side vs Sell-Side QoE
A QoE report can be commissioned by either the buyer or the seller, and the objectives differ slightly depending on the perspective.
A buy-side quality of earnings report is prepared for a potential acquirer. It helps validate the seller’s financial claims, highlights risks, and tests valuation assumptions. Buyers use the findings to negotiate purchase price and other terms in the SPA. The report maintains an investigative, skeptical tone to protect the buyer’s interests.
A sell-side quality of earnings report is prepared by the seller before marketing a business for sale. It identifies and resolves issues upfront, presents normalized earnings clearly, and builds buyer confidence. This process reduces surprises, supports higher valuation, and helps achieve a smoother, faster, and more credible transaction.
| Aspect | Buy-Side QoE | Sell-Side QoE |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | Validate seller claims; Find risks and downward valuation adjustments. | Defend valuation; Identify issues upfront; Streamline the sale process. |
| Audience | Buyer, their advisors, and lenders. | Potential buyers (shared by the seller). |
| Outcome | Strengthens buyer’s position in negotiations. | Smoother, faster due diligence process. |
| Level of Scrutiny | More critical and conservative. | More promotional (but still fact-based). |
| Approach | Skeptical and risk-oriented. | Supportive and presentation-oriented. |
| Timing | Conducted after LOI / during diligence (buyer exclusivity period). | Conducted before going to market. |
| Key Beneficiaries | Buyer (reduced risk, informed pricing). | Seller (higher valuation, reduced surprises in diligence). |
| Impact on Deal | Purchase price adjustments; Renegotiation; Deal abandonment if risks are too high. | Smoother diligence; Reduced price erosion; Faster deal timeline. |
Scope, Timeline, and Cost
The scope, timeline, and QoE report pricing depend on several factors. There is no one-size-fits-all answer, but knowing these variables helps set realistic expectations.
Key factors that influence the quality of earnings report cost and scope include:
- Company Size & Complexity: Larger companies with multiple divisions, locations, or currencies require more detailed work compared to smaller, single-location business.
- Quality of Financial Records: Companies with organized, audited financial statements and responsive management team make the QoE process faster than those with incomplete or disorganized records.
- Industry Specifics: Certain industries require deeper procedures. For example, analyzing inventory-heavy businesses or international operations usually adds more time and cost.
- Carve-Outs: Analyzing a carved-out division of a larger parent company is often more complex because of shared costs and intercompany transactions.
The typical quality of earnings timeline ranges from 3 to 4 weeks, depending on these factors and responsiveness of the company management. The Quality of Earnings price is usually based on the agreed-upon scope of work (SoW), with most reputed firms like OGScapital charging either a fixed fee or a capped fee structure.
Quality of Earnings Consulting & Analysis Services
At OGScapital, we provide professional Quality of Earnings analysis services for buyers, sellers, and lenders. Our process is efficient, clear, and focused on giving you the information you need to make confident decisions.
Our team is led by senior professionals with deep transaction experience. We work closely with you and the target company, ensuring every step of the analysis is smooth and adds real value.
Our Quality of Earnings consulting services include:
- A dedicated team led by a senior partner.
- A comprehensive QoE report with a clear executive summary.
- Full transparency on all adjustments and findings.
- Strict confidentiality to protect your sensitive information.
- Ongoing support during negotiations and closing.
To begin, we request access to your company’s financial data under a strict non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to ensure confidentiality. After a preliminary review, our team will share a detailed scope of work along with a clear pricing proposal.
Let us help you get your deal done right. Contact us for a confidential consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a QoE report and how is it used?
A Quality of Earnings (QoE) report is a detailed financial analysis that assesses the sustainability of a company’s earnings. It is used in mergers and acquisitions to validate a company’s true earning potential, which helps buyers and sellers agree on a fair valuation and set key terms in the purchase agreement.
QoE vs financial audit – what’s the difference?
A financial audit gives an opinion on whether a company’s historical financial statements are accurate and follow accounting standards. A Quality of Earnings (QoE) report analyzes a company’s sustainable earnings and future performance for a transaction. Audits focus on compliance, while QoE reports support valuation and deal-making decisions.
What are common QoE adjustments?
Common QoE adjustments cover non-recurring revenue and expenses, out-of-period items, non-operating costs, pro forma and run-rate adjustments, and owner or related-party transactions. These adjustments produce a “Normalized EBITDA” that reflects the company’s ongoing operations.
How long does a QoE report take?
A typical Quality of Earnings (QoE) report takes three to four weeks to complete. The timeline depends on business size, complexity, financial record quality, and management responsiveness. Smaller, simpler businesses usually require less time to complete the analysis.
What affects QoE pricing?
The cost of a Quality of Earnings (QoE) report depends on the company’s revenue size, operational complexity such as multiple locations or foreign currency, and the quality of accounting records. Well-organized financials usually result in lower QoE costs than disorganized books.
Do you provide buy-side and sell-side QoE?
Yes, we offer both buy-side and sell-side Quality of Earnings (QoE) services. For buyers, we focus on validating financials and identifying risks. For sellers, we prepare defensible earnings analyses that build credibility and streamline due diligence for prospective buyers.
What’s included in a QoE checklist?
A Quality of Earnings (QoE) checklist includes a list of required documents, revenue and COGS analysis, operating expenses review, EBITDA normalization, cash flow assessment, balance sheet and working capital analysis, data reconciliations, and final reporting with key findings and supporting schedules.
