Quality of Earnings (QoE) Checklist for M&A Buyers

In recent years, stricter due diligence has reshaped dealmaking. Studies show that buyers now walk away from nearly 65% of potential M&A deals after initial financial screening. The reason? Unverified numbers and questionable earnings quality. That’s why a quality of earnings checklist has become a must-have for every serious M&A buyer.

A buy-side quality of earnings analysis is the backbone of M&A financial due diligence. It digs deeper than standard audits to confirm whether reported profits truly reflect sustainable cash flow. In 2025, QoE checklist matters more than ever as lenders tighten terms and investors demand proof behind every number.

Today’s M&A buyers face three main challenges:

• Tougher underwriting and limited credit availability.
• Growing pressure to validate normalized EBITDA.
• Rising scrutiny of revenue quality and one-time adjustments.

A clear quality of earnings analysis helps buyers stay ahead by:

• Prioritizing key data requests early.
• Spotting anomalies in revenue, seasonality, or customer mix.
• Aligning on a fair working capital peg before closing.

With over 70% of M&A transactions now requiring formal financial due diligence QoE, skipping it is no longer an option.

This guide explains what QoE for M&A buyers includes, accepted testing methods, typical deliverables, cost drivers, red flags, and how to select a credible QoE provider who delivers clear, actionable insights.

Why M&A Buyers Need a Quality of Earnings Review

The primary goal of a buy-side quality of earnings review is to validate a target company’s sustainable earnings. Unlike an audit, which verifies historical financial statements, a QoE report focuses on the future performance you inherit as a buyer. It provides a detailed earnings quality assessment that informs your valuation and deal structure.

Buyers use a QoE review to:

• Validate sustainable earnings
• Separate recurring vs. non-recurring items
• Review revenue recognition and margin stability
• Confirm cash conversion efficiency
• Review working capital trends
• Evaluate customer concentration risk
• Adjust for seasonality to get a normalized EBITDA
• Reconcile add-backs
• Compare management forecasts with historical performance

Normalized EBITDA analysis findings directly influence three major deal factors:

1. Purchase price through adjustments to reported EBITDA.
2. Deal structure by revealing risks that may need escrows or earn-outs.
3. Representations and warranties by identifying areas where stronger coverage protects the buyer.

QoE vs. Audit: What’s the Difference?

QoE differs fundamentally from audits and compilations. Audits verify historical compliance with accounting standards. Compilations simply organize financial data. The quality of earnings report goes deeper, testing assumptions behind accruals, examining reserves adequacy, and stress-testing key performance drivers.

Aspect	QoE Review	Audit	Compilation
Objective	Assess sustainability, cash flow, and true earnings	Verify compliance with accounting standards	Present financial data without assurance
Scope	EBITDA bridge, revenue quality, working capital, add-backs	Detailed testing of all accounts	No detailed testing
User	Buyers, lenders, investors	Management, shareholders, tax	Management only
Evidence Standard	Substantive testing with lender-ready documentation	Follows audit standards	Limited evidence collection
Result	Custom, forward-looking QoE report with deal insights	Standard audit opinion	Basic financial statements

Any questions? Get in touch!

Name*

Email*

Phone

Why QoE Matters in 2025

Access to finance is the biggest barrier to SME growth. The IFC-World Bank MSME Finance Gap Report (March 2025) shows a $5.7 trillion funding gap across 119 emerging industries. Around 40% of formal MSMEs still face credit limits. This shortage pushes lenders to demand strong QoE for M&A buyers analysis before approving capital.

With stricter lending rules, a detailed quality of earnings review is now essential. Lenders examine every EBITDA adjustment and expect clear, verified documentation for normalized earnings calculations.

A well-prepared QoE enables buyers to:

• Support acquisition financing by presenting credible, normalized EBITDA.
• Protect valuation assumptions by identifying one-time items and unsustainable margins.
• Negotiate confidently, backed by independently verified financial adjustments.

Key Factors Driving QoE Importance

1. Defensible Metrics: 84% of lenders now require detailed documentation for all QoE adjustments and normalized EBITDA analysis components. Template-driven reports no longer suffice.

2. Concentration Risks: Any customer contributing over 10% of revenue is a clear QoE red flag. A customer concentration analysis helps buyers identify dependency risks and plan for revenue diversification.

3. Seasonality Impact: Seasonal highs can distort real profits. Buyers should normalize revenue and margins to reflect steady earnings.

4. Backlog and Pipeline Quality: Buyer must verify order books, test contract convertibility, and confirm pipeline assumptions. High competition and inflated backlogs make this essential for accurate forecasting.

5. Working capital discipline: Buyer should conduct a working capital analysis QoE to identify liquidity gaps, supplier payment cycles, and short-term funding needs.

Enhanced Documentation Requirements

Buyers expect a quality of earnings analysis that:

1. Uses consistent documentation of revenue drivers and adjustments.
2. Test EBITDA sensitivity to pricing, volume, and margin assumptions.
3. Highlights QoE red flags, such as unusual vendor terms or deferred costs.
4. Aligns accounting policies across periods for fair trend comparison.

Average QoE Cost in the USA

A quality of earnings report typically costs $8,000 to $150,000 or more in the United States, depending on deal size, data complexity, and business type. Understanding these pricing helps M&A buyers budget accurately during financial due diligence QoE work.

Deal Size and Complexity Drive Pricing

QoE costs rise with deal value and scope of analysis. Smaller deals need lighter testing, while larger ones require deeper reviews and more coordination.

Scope Item	Under $1M	$1M – $10M	$10M – $20M	$20M – $30M	Above $30M
Cost Range	$8,000 – $15,000	$15,000 – $30,000	$30,000 – $50,000	$50,000 – $75,000	$75,000 – $150,000+
Basic revenue verification	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Simplified EBITDA review	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Key expense testing	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Revenue testing	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
EBITDA normalization	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Basic working capital analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Add-back identification	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Full QoE analysis	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Comprehensive add-backs	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Working capital peg analysis	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Customer concentration review	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Multi-location reviews	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅
Detailed operational analysis	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅
Extended procedures	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅
Industry benchmarking	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅
Multi-entity consolidation	❌	❌	❌	❌	✅
Carve-outs	❌	❌	❌	❌	✅
Cross-border considerations	❌	❌	❌	❌	✅
Comprehensive risk assessment	❌	❌	❌	❌	✅

90% of the private M&A deals are below $30M, where buyers often need basic QoE reports. Larger or more complex deals, especially those with international entities or carve-outs, need advanced testing and multi-entity reviews.

We were proud to be a trusted partner
of Flippa.com (#1 marketplace to buy/sell online businesses) conducting buy-side due diligences for all transactions on that marketplace in the past.

Download QoE Samples

Standard Scope vs. Add-Ons

Base fees cover different testing depths based on deal size:

• Standard reports focus on adjusted EBITDA assistance and financial position analysis. 
• Enhanced reports include full quality of earnings analysis, historical revenue review, business growth drivers, and working capital requirements. 
• Web-based businesses require specialized testing including traffic verification and marketing analytics.

Service Component	Standard Report (<$3M)	Enhanced Report (>$3M)	Add-On Cost
Adjusted EBITDA analysis	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	—
Normalized EBITDA calculation	✅ Yes	✅ Yes	—
QoE adjustments testing	Limited	Full scope	—
Working capital requirements	Basic	Comprehensive	—
On-site visits	❌ No	❌ Optional	$5,000 – $15,000
Vendor calls	❌ No	❌ Optional	$10,000 – $25,000
Carve-out financials	❌ No	❌ Optional	$15,000 – $30,000

Timeline Impact on Fees

Standard QoE engagements take two to four weeks depending on complexity. Traditional or web-based businesses with deal value under $3 million require two to three weeks, while deals above $3 million need three to four weeks. Rush delivery carries a 20% to 40% premium. Using a Quality of Earnings checklist upfront reduces delays.

Business Type	Deal Value	Report Type	Timeline
Traditional	< $3M	Standard	2 – 3 weeks
Traditional	> $3M	Enhanced	3 – 4 weeks
Web-based	< $3M	Standard	2 – 3 weeks
Web-based	> $3M	Enhanced	3 – 4 weeks

Deliverable Milestones

Professional Quality of Earnings Services follow a structured process – from initial financial analysis and draft findings to management discussions and final report delivery.

1. Draft Report: Delivered in week 2 for standard or week 3-4 for enhanced reports.
2. Management Q&A: Conducted during week 2-3 for standard or week 3-4 for enhanced reports.
3. Final Report: Includes executive summary, EBITDA bridge, QoE adjustments, recommendations, and detailed appendices ready for lenders.

Milestone	Standard Report	Enhanced Report	Deliverable
Draft Report	Week 2	Week 3 – 4	Initial findings document
Management Q&A	Week 2 – 3	Week 3 – 4	Q&A session and follow-up
Final Report	Week 3	Week 4	Full QoE package

Any questions? Get in touch!

Name*

Email*

Phone

Key Factors That Influence Qoe Price

Multiple variables drive QoE adjustments to standard pricing. Understanding these factors helps buyers obtain accurate quotes and avoid scope creep during the engagement.

1. Data Quality and Availability

Clean, well-organized financial data reduces QoE costs significantly. Companies with robust accounting systems enable efficient testing procedures.

Characteristics of a well-organized data room include:

• Complete general ledgers with detailed transaction coding
• Organized supporting documentation readily accessible
• Consistent chart of accounts across all periods
• Regular bank and account reconciliations current
• Clear audit trails linking transactions to source documents

Conversely, unorganized data rooms with incomplete records can increase the QoE cost by 15-25%. Missing backup documentation forces time-consuming reconstruction efforts. Poor data quality often extends timelines by two to three weeks.

2. Industry-Specific Complexity

Different sectors require specialized procedures that standard QoE approaches don’t cover. Industry expertise becomes critical for accurate analysis.

Sector-Specific Requirements:

Industry	Key QoE Focus	Impact on Pricing
SaaS	Churn analysis, customer cohorts testing, deferred revenue validation, ARR/MRR reconciliation	High
Manufacturing	Cost accounting review, inventory valuation testing, overhead absorption analysis, standard cost variance examination	Medium
Retail	Utilization rate testing, project margin analysis, backlog quality validation, work-in-progress verification	Moderate

3. Multi-Entity Consolidations

Targets with multiple subsidiaries often maintain separate accounting systems. This increases the need for reconciliations and consistency checks across ledgers.

To ensure accuracy, the QoE provider must:

• Align different charts of accounts.
• Reconcile intercompany balances and eliminations.
• Confirm consistent accounting policies and revenue cut-offs.
• Analyze segment-level profitability to detect loss-making divisions.

Each extra entity adds hours to the normalized EBITDA analysis and working capital analysis QoE, pushing the total cost higher.

4. Carve-Outs

Division or business unit carve-outs are challenging since the target may not have standalone books. Auditors must rebuild standalone financials. Carve-outs typically add 30-50% to standard QoE costs.

Steps in a carve-out QoE include:

1. Identify direct expenses directly attributable to the carved-out business
2. Allocate shared costs based on appropriate allocation methods
3. Estimate stranded costs that were previously absorbed
4. Reconstruct standalone financial statements 
5. Validate assumptions against industry benchmarks

5. Revenue Complexity

Businesses with long-term contracts or subscription models require a more detailed revenue recognition review against standards like ASC 606. This increases both timeline and cost due to key challenges like:

• Multiple recognition methods across products.
• Timing of cut-off testing.
• High volume of small contracts needing sampling.
• Seasonality or churn that complicates trend analysis.

6. Inventory Methods

Different valuation methods (FIFO, LIFO, or weighted average) influence cost and margin accuracy. When these methods vary across entities or years, the QoE team must verify comparability.

Inventory testing usually includes:

• Verifying cost flow assumptions.
• Checking inventory write-downs and obsolescence.
• Testing gross margin stability under different costing approaches.

This factor has a moderate impact on financial due diligence QoE pricing.

7. International Operations

Cross-border operations bring additional accounting, tax, and currency risks. Multi-currency consolidation and local GAAP differences require more advanced testing which increases timeline and QoE cost.

8. Legal and Tax Intersections

Legal and tax intersections often trigger additional checks. Pending litigation, transfer pricing disputes, or earn-out clauses can affect normalized results.

Extra analysis is needed when:

• The company has open tax audits or ongoing disputes.
• There are related-party transactions or shareholder loans.
• SPA terms depend on QoE findings (e.g., escrow, earn-out, or indemnity).

Any questions? Get in touch!

Name*

Email*

Phone

Cost Breakdown by Deal Type and Industry

Understanding the quality of earnings (QoE) checklist costs helps M&A buyers plan budgets accurately and assess provider quotes fairly. QoE report costs range from $8,000 to $150,000 or more, depending on the target company’s industry, complexity, and data room quality.

Below is a breakdown of QoE cost patterns across major sectors:

SaaS

SaaS QoE costs $8,000 to $80,000 or more, based on customer volume, billing complexity, and data system quality.

Recurring revenue models of SaaS need specialized testing unlike traditional businesses. Lenders mainly assess customer concentration and cohort retention to measure revenue stability.

SaaS QoE Cost and Scope Breakdown by Target Profile

QoE Scope	Micro SaaS	Small SaaS	Growth SaaS	Established SaaS	Enterprise SaaS
Operation Size	<100 customers	100 – 500 customers	500 – 1000 customers	1000 – 2000 customers	2000+ customers
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)	<$1M	$1M – $10M	$10M – $30M	$30M – $50M	>$50M
QoE Report Cost	$8,000 – $15,000	$15,000 – $25,000	$25,000 – $40,000	$40,000 – $55,000	$55,000 – $80,000+
Revenue verification (ARR/MRR)	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Contract sampling & renewal testing	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Expense trend analysis	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Churn & retention analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Deferred revenue analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Add-back normalization	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Working capital review	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
SaaS metrics (LTV/CAC, churn cohorts)	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Usage-based revenue testing	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Customer concentration	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Forecast validation & sensitivity	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅

Manufacturing

Manufacturing QoE costs $25,000 to $140,000 or more, based on SKU complexity, product diversity, and facility count. 

Manufacturing QoE focuses on inventory, cost of goods sold (COGS), and cost flow through production. A thorough working capital analysis QOE ensures the balance sheet avoids obsolete stock and gross margins remain accurate.

Manufacturing QoE Cost and Scope Breakdown by Target Profile

Scope Item	Micro Manufacturer	Small Manufacturer	Mid Manufacturer	Diversified Manufacturer	Large Manufacturer with Global or Carve-out
Operation Size	1 facility, <25 SKUs	1-2 facilities, 25-75 SKUs	3-5 facilities, 75-150 SKUs	5-10 facilities, 150-300 SKUs	10+ facilities, 200+ staff
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)	<$1M	$1M – $10M	$10M – $30M	$30M – $50M	>$50M
Cost Range	$25,000 – $40,000	$40,000 – $65,000	$65,000 – $100,000	$100,000 – $125,000	$125,000 – $140,000+
Revenue testing (by product line)	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
COGS validation & margin review	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Normalization of owner costs	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Working capital analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Inventory valuation & reserves	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Add-back & one-time adjustment	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Customer concentration analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Plant-level profitability	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Equipment lease & CAPEX review	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Supply chain dependency mapping	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅

Retail

Retail QoE costs $20,000 to $80,000 or more based on store count and SKU complexity.

Retail store-level performance and promotions need detailed testing that scales with business size. The revenue recognition review covers gift card liabilities, loyalty program accounting, and promotion timing, which can shift revenue between periods.

Retail QoE Cost and Scope Breakdown by Target Profile

Scope Item	Boutique Retail	Local Chain	Regional Chain	National Retailer	Enterprise Retail
Operation Size	1 store, 2-10 staff	2-15 stores, 20-100 staff	16-50 stores, 100-200 staff	50-150 stores, 200-400 staff	150+ stores, 400+ staff
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)	<$1M	$1M – $5M	$5M – $10M	$10M – $20M	$20M+
Cost Range	$20,000 – $30,000	$30,000 – $40,000	$40,000 – $55,000	$55,000 – $70,000	$70,000 – $80,000+
Revenue validation by channel	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Refunds & returns review	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Marketing & ad spend validation	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
SKU-level profitability	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Inventory reserve testing	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Add-backs & one-time items	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Marketplace vs. DTC split	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Customer concentration	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Working capital peg analysis	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Multi-entity consolidation	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅

Healthcare

Healthcare QoE costs $15,000 to $100,000 or more due to its heavy regulatory environment.

Healthcare QoE analysis requires deep expertise in convoluted reimbursement models from a mix of payers. The primary risk being assessed is the collectability of revenue, which directly impacts pricing.

Healthcare QoE Cost and Scope Breakdown by Target Profile

Scope Item	Solo Clinic	Group Practice	Multi-site Network	Specialty ASC or Hospital Group	Enterprise Health Group
Operation Size	1 site, 2-5 staff	2-5 sites, 5-25 staff	6-10 sites, 25-75 staff	10-25 sites, 75-200 staff	25+ sites, 200+ staff
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)	<$2M	$2M – $5M	$5M – $10M	$10M – $20M	$20M+
Cost Range	$15,000 – $25,000	$25,000 – $40,000	$40,000 – $60,000	$60,000 – $80,000	$80,000 – $100,000+
Revenue & billing reconciliation	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Normalization & add-backs	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Payor concentration analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Working capital review	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Deferred revenue (prepaid packages)	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Aged AR analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Seasonality & patient volume trends	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Lease, staffing, and compliance review	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Reimbursement rate testing	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Segment profitability	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅

Business Services

QoE for service-based businesses cost $20,000 to $80,000 or more. 

QoE for professional services depend on human capital efficiency rather than physical assets or inventory. Customer concentration analysis focuses on client tenure, renewal probability, and historical spending patterns that indicate revenue stability.

Business Services QoE Cost and Scope Breakdown by Target Profile

Scope Item	Freelance or Micro-agency	Small Firm	Mid-sized Practice	Large Firm	Enterprise or global service firm
Operation Size	<10 staff	10-25 staff	25-75 staff	75-200 staff	200+ staff
Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR)	<$500K	$500K – $2M	$2M – $5M	$5M – $10M	$10M+
Cost Range	$20,000 – $30,000	$30,000 – $40,000	$40,000 – $55,000	$55,000 – $70,000	$70,000 – $80,000+
Revenue recognition testing	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Expense & payroll normalization	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
Partner compensation adjustments	✅	✅	✅	✅	✅
WIP & unbilled revenue review	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Customer concentration	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Working capital analysis	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Contract backlog testing	❌	✅	✅	✅	✅
Deferred revenue validation	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Segment profitability	❌	❌	✅	✅	✅
Multi-entity consolidation	❌	❌	❌	✅	✅

Any questions? Get in touch!

Name*

Email*

Phone

What’s Included in a QoE

A quality of earnings report helps buyers assess earnings stability and detect financial risks before an acquisition. A buy-side QoE confirms revenue accuracy, tests QoE adjustments, and reconciles reported results with real economic performance.

1. Bridge from Reported to Normalized EBITDA

The key element of every normalized EBITDA analysis is the bridge from reported earnings to adjusted EBITDA.

Add-backs for Normalized EBITDA:

• Owner compensation exceeding market rates
• Non-recurring professional fees
• Discontinued product lines
• One-time gains or losses from asset sales
• Related-party transactions at off-market prices
• Stock-based compensation
• Above-market rent paid to related entities

The QoE team verifies each add-back with documentation, confirming adjustments are non-recurring and properly calculated.

2. Revenue and Margin Analytics

These analytics test the quality, consistency, and sustainability of earnings to confirm whether revenue is stable and margins are defendable post-deal.

Steps for Revenue and Margin Review:

1. Compare revenue by product, customer, and geography
2. Review margin trends across time and business units
3. Match sales records with ledgers
4. Identify customer concentration or churn risks
5. Adjust for seasonality or deferred revenue

3. Working Capital Roll-Forward and Peg Analysis

Working capital analysis QoE measures cash required for daily operations. The roll-forward tracks changes in receivables, inventory, payables, and current accounts, establishing the working capital peg sellers must deliver at close.

The analysis covers:

• Monthly or quarterly balances
• Seasonal patterns and peak requirements
• Days sales outstanding, inventory turns, payment terms
• Normalized working capital target

Buyers use this data to negotiate the peg and structure adjustments if closing balances fall short.

4. Cash vs. Accrual Tests

These tests check if reported earnings match real cash flow. A company may show profits on paper but lose cash if receivables grow faster than sales.

Test Area	Cash Basis	Accrual Basis
Revenue Recognition	When received	When earned
Expenses	When paid	When incurred
EBITDA Impact	May fluctuate	More stable

Significant gaps require QoE adjustments to reflect actual performance.

5. Sensitivity Analyses

Sensitivity tests show how key assumptions affect normalized EBITDA and valuation. It covers:

• EBITDA without top customers or contracts
• Margin change under lower revenue
• Working capital under delayed collections
• Add-back changes and price impact

6. Executive Summary with Key Findings and Red Flags

Executive summary sums up the quality of earnings report into actionable insights, presenting adjusted EBITDA, major add-backs, and valuation concerns. It covers:

• Final normalized EBITDA with confidence level
• Material risks
• Accounting concerns
• Recommended valuation adjustments
• Items requiring further investigation

Buyers rely on this summary to guide negotiations, update financial models, and risk protections.

Cheap vs. Professional QoE: What Are You Really Paying For?

When buyers compare a low-cost, template-based report with a professional Quality of Earnings analysis, the cost gap may seem big, but the risk gap is larger. Template-based reports might look fine initially, but real problems arise later through rework, closing delays, or disputes during the Share Purchase Agreement (SPA) stage.

Here’s what separates cheap from professional buy-side Quality of Earnings:

Template-Driven vs. Expert QoE

Aspect	Template-Driven QoE	Professional QoE
Procedure Depth	Standard checklists, surface-level testing	Substantive testing
Evidence Standards	Management interviews, high-level tie-outs	Source documents, bank records, vendor invoices
Error Rates	High (5-10%)	Low (<2%)
Adjustment Support	Verbal explanations, weak backups	Documented calculations, defensible bridges
Lender Acceptance	Often requires rework	Widely accepted
Impact on SPA Terms	Weak working capital analysis, post-close disputes	Strong SPA terms, defensible valuation, clean closing

Hidden Costs of a “cheap” Financial Due Diligence QoE

A cheap financial due diligence QoE may seem attractive at first, but it often causes:

• Rework costs: Incomplete analysis requires additional work, increasing total costs by 30-50%.
• Closing delays: Lender pushback on substandard reports delay closings by 2-4 weeks.
• Post-Close disputes: Insufficient QoE documentation leads to earn-out disagreements and escrow claims.
• Valuation impact: Missed QoE red flags can result in overpayment of 10-15% of purchase price.

Any questions? Get in touch!

Name*

Email*

Phone

Why Choose a Professional QoE

A professional QoE doesn’t just validate earnings. It’s built by experienced professionals that stands up to scrutiny, avoids rework, and keeps deals on track.

Professional QoE pays off because it:

• Tests every key revenue stream for consistency and sustainability.
• Builds a defensible EBITDA bridge with clear support for each adjustment.
• Prepares a buy-side quality of earnings report that aligns with lender expectations.
• Reduces risk of post-close surprises and supports smoother integration.

Sample QoE Scope and Cost Scenarios

A quality of earnings report doesn’t come in one fixed format. Its scope, cost, and timeline shift based on deal size, industry, and data complexity. Below are four practical examples showing how a QoE checklist plays out in real transactions.

Sample 1: Small SaaS Add-On Acquisition

A micro-PE fund acquired a niche project tracking software business with $850K ARR and a customer base of 100+ small online sellers. The team had just five employees.

Sample 2: Multi-Plant Manufacturer

A family office reviewed a $7.8 million metal components manufacturer operating two plants supplying regional OEM clients.

Sample 3: Multi-Site Healthcare

A growth equity fund evaluated a seven-clinic physical therapy group generating $15 million in revenue from commercial and Medicaid contracts.

Sample 4: Consumer Roll-Up

A mid-market PE group analyzed a $28 million online home goods retailer operating eight brands and multiple fulfillment centers across five states.

How to Choose the Right QoE Provider

Choosing the right QoE provider for your quality of earnings report can make or break your deal. At OGScapital, we’ve handled over $9.0 billion in M&A transactions across 40 industries, serving 200+ due diligence clients with our 30 MBA consultants over 17 years.

From our experience, buyers should focus on eight clear evaluation areas before engaging a QoE firm.

Vendor Scorecard Checklist

Evaluation Area	What to Look For (Checklist)
Sector Experience	Proven industry experience Sector-specific knowledge Prior QoE track record
Methodology	Bottom-up testing of revenue, margins, and QoE adjustments Consistent, audit-grade approach Includes working capital analysis QoE
Data Request List Quality	Practical and realistic requests Aligned with deal size Minimizes back-and-forth
Independence	No prior relationship with seller Unbiased analysis
QA/Partner Review	Senior partner reviews every deliverable Documented quality checks Consistent accuracy across engagements
Sample Reports	Anonymized QoE report samples Lender-ready format with EBITDA bridges
References	At least three verified client references Positive accuracy and communication feedback Strong track record with lenders
Proposal Transparency	Clear scope and deliverables Transparent fees No hidden assumptions

Mini RFP Checklist

When sending out RFPs, always ask vendors these eight questions:

1. How many similar deals has your team completed in the past few months?
2. What specific industry risks do you test for in our target sector?
3. Can you provide references from recent buy-side quality of earnings engagements?
4. How do you ensure quality control and partner review of deliverables?
5. What is your typical timeline for draft and final quality of earnings report delivery?
6. Can you share examples of QoE red flags you’ve identified in similar deals?
7. How do you handle additional procedures if significant issues are identified?
8. What level of ongoing support do you provide during financing and closing?

At OGScapital, we benchmark each proposal against these same criteria. This ensures buyers receive lender-ready deliverables, transparent pricing, and reliable insights that strengthen every deal decision.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)